On the one hand, I would love to see Stevie Nicks in concert.
On the other hand, I am not enough of a fan of hers* to pay a minimum of $135 + Ticketmaster/Live Nation/whatever ticket agency handling fees. I can count on ONE HAND the artists I would be willing to pay that much money to see, and she's not on that list.
*I'll be totally honest: while I admire the hell out of her, and I like a bunch of her music, I am much more a fan of her fashion than her voice.
On the other hand, I am not enough of a fan of hers* to pay a minimum of $135 + Ticketmaster/Live Nation/whatever ticket agency handling fees. I can count on ONE HAND the artists I would be willing to pay that much money to see, and she's not on that list.
*I'll be totally honest: while I admire the hell out of her, and I like a bunch of her music, I am much more a fan of her fashion than her voice.
From:
no subject
I think the only artists that I'd pay that much to see would require time travel, because I'd want to see them at their prime.
But, yeah. It would be great to see her, but that ticket price is ridiculous.
-- A :/
From:
no subject
Nowadays? Tom Waits, Kate Bush, and MCR. That's pretty much it. Maybe The Cure, if they played a Seattle date that wasn't a festival. But really, I can't think of anyone else.
From:
no subject
My 'I will pay $$$$$' list is: Rush and Midnight Oil. Rush stopped touring, and Midnight Oil haven't technically reformed yet. So I'm safe!
From:
no subject
Ugh. That is crazy-pants. I'll stick with seeing Garbage and hitting VooDoo. At least for that one I get a trip to New Orleans out of it.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
Luckily, I got to see all the shows I would have paid that much for, for a lot less back in the day. And, most of those artists are dead now. :-(
From:
no subject