I told the Madwoman the science behind why melting the butter would work better for the crispier gingersnaps I prefer for the bats. (Science learned by you commentators and a few cooking blogs run by actual scientists.) However, as soon as the words "cooking blogs" left my mouth, she shut off her ears, or at least filtered what I was saying through her vehement and perpetual annoyance at cooking blogs.
"The ones I looked at are written by actual scientists!"
"COOKING. BLOGS."
So! I am making a batch of dough with my recipe, and she will make a batch of dough "fixing" my recipe, and then we'll see which works for what I want.
To be clear, she's in no way annoyed with me. She's just baffled and very cynical.
(Mind you, she's also amused that the Stroppy One and I follow cooking times on recipes, going so far as to set timers.)
Anyway, all of this to say: TWO BATCHES OF COOKIES, HECK YEAH.
From:
no subject
Witchy user pic!
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
I do tend to say, "Dammit, Jim, I'm a cook not a baker!" but if you want thin and crispy, melted butter is the correct thing, I concur. Creaming introduces a lot more air into the cookies, which of course makes them fluffier. I believe Alton Brown did a Good Eats episode on chocolate chip cookies that discusses various ways to get different effects, including creaming vs melted butter.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
i look forward to hearing about the results.
From:
no subject
I know roughly how long everything I bake is supposed to take, but I still set timers because sometimes they don't quite follow the pattern, and so that I WILL REMEMBER TO CHECK.
Also, the recipe for the butterscotch bars came off the back of the Guittard butterscotch chips package. I idly checked it this year...and they changed it to require melted butter instead of solid butter and creaming. I'd already made mine using the old version of the recipe but I might try it the new way next time.
From:
no subject
*Except for cornbread.