cupcake_goth (
cupcake_goth) wrote2007-11-20 01:38 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Magazine review, and oh why not, SFDs
I recently picked up an issue of Altered Couture Magazine. (Clicky-link!) One of my obsessions hobbies is modifying and customizing clothing, so I figured that Altered Couture would be Just My Thing. In reality? Not so much.
The magazine itself is gorgeous. Nicely printed on quality paperstock, good layout, clear photography, all that. But that clear photography is entirely of finished projects; there are no "how-to" shots at all. Also, the instructions they give for each item are pretty sparse. This is NOT a magazine for someone who is looking for guidance and hand-holding, it is much more a magazine for people who are already pretty DIY-savvy and are in need of inspiration and new ideas. But who apparently have never thought to go look around online, which is how I find new ideas for customizing clothing.
My other gripe with the projects showcased in the magazine are that most of them are of the deconstructed and "Look at me! I'm an Artistic and Bohemian Piece of Clothing! Marvel at my fingerpainted details!" design school. Which is a perfectly legitimate approach to modifying clothing, but I would prefer to see stuff that looks more finished and less "Arts and Crafts Class". Or that at least looks more punk-rock arts and crafts class, instead of suburban soccer mom.
So, I'm probably not going to buy another issue. But I AM tempted to submit something for their "Thrifty Ensembles" section. The submission guidelines for that are:
"Art-to-wear"? Is there something about that phrase that seems overly precious and twee, or is it just me being cranky? And also, I'm not sure if they mean you have to send the outfit to them and you don't get it back, or something else. Anyway, I'm still amused by sending them a write-up of what *I* normally do to thrift store finds.
Speaking of thrift store finds*, hey look! Shallow Fashion Details!
*The boots, skirt, blouse, and jacket were all from assorted thrift shopping expeditions.
The magazine itself is gorgeous. Nicely printed on quality paperstock, good layout, clear photography, all that. But that clear photography is entirely of finished projects; there are no "how-to" shots at all. Also, the instructions they give for each item are pretty sparse. This is NOT a magazine for someone who is looking for guidance and hand-holding, it is much more a magazine for people who are already pretty DIY-savvy and are in need of inspiration and new ideas. But who apparently have never thought to go look around online, which is how I find new ideas for customizing clothing.
My other gripe with the projects showcased in the magazine are that most of them are of the deconstructed and "Look at me! I'm an Artistic and Bohemian Piece of Clothing! Marvel at my fingerpainted details!" design school. Which is a perfectly legitimate approach to modifying clothing, but I would prefer to see stuff that looks more finished and less "Arts and Crafts Class". Or that at least looks more punk-rock arts and crafts class, instead of suburban soccer mom.
So, I'm probably not going to buy another issue. But I AM tempted to submit something for their "Thrifty Ensembles" section. The submission guidelines for that are:
- Visit a thrift store and purchase a complete outfit for no more than $20.
- Take "before" photos of the outfit.
- Alter the outfit a la Altered Couture so that it transforms into an art-to-wear outfit.
- Write a brief description about the experience.
- Submit the photos, altered outfit, and description.
"Art-to-wear"? Is there something about that phrase that seems overly precious and twee, or is it just me being cranky? And also, I'm not sure if they mean you have to send the outfit to them and you don't get it back, or something else. Anyway, I'm still amused by sending them a write-up of what *I* normally do to thrift store finds.
Speaking of thrift store finds*, hey look! Shallow Fashion Details!
- Black granny boots.
- Pink & white striped knee-socks (being held up with pink and black satin sock garters), worn over pink tights.
- Knee-length full black wool skirt with a ruffled hem, worn over knee-length pink petticoats.
- White cotton ruffly high-collared blouse.
- Black stretchy waist cincher with lace trim.
- Waist-length double-breasted black wool jacket with a shawl collar.
- Jewelry: multiple strands of pink glass pearls, my antique pocket watch necklace, a pink and black skull cameo brooch on the lapel of the jacket, and the usual giant rings.
- Makeup and hair: hair worn down, YSL Touch Eclat, MAC "whistle" eyeshadow with "mothbrown" at the corners, black pencil under my eyes, black liquid liner on the top lids, DiorShow mascara, translucent powder, and Aromaleigh "grenadine" lipstick.
*The boots, skirt, blouse, and jacket were all from assorted thrift shopping expeditions.
no subject
I was trying to remember and find, but my searches aren't bringing up where you mentioned it..
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Nope, that's precious and twee. *shudders*
Am also giggling at suburban soccer mom arts and crafts.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I imagine how-to's would be helpful, especially for the larger or more expensive undertakings, but I accept their challenge...
no subject
Like a Bjork/Tori Amos duet.
no subject
no subject
I am all for well-done modification to things, but the key there is well-done. None of this trying to pass off shoddy work and bad seams as "deconstructed", thankyouverymuch.
no subject
Now if only I could find things that weren't already worn to rags or simply hideous on my thrifting adventures I'd be in business.
no subject
(A confession: every time I try my hand at deconstructed items, they Just Don't Work. It's very vexing.)
no subject
Not to be self-important (ok, well, I am!), but I'd even extend that idea to my twisted historicals. And esp. to the outfits
no subject
Ooooh, I should take a look through
no subject